TRAITORS: GOP Leadership attempt to undermine Obama's Foreign Policy...Again


Screen Shot 2015-03-10 at 8.20.18 AM.png

As the news swirls around the "diplomatic" letter sent from GOP leadership to Iran leaders, many news organizations, including the New York Daily News headlined above, have gone even further with their claims:

The GOP Senators that put forth the letter "educating" Middle Eastern leaders of our foreign policy doctrine are in fact traitors of the state and are actually quite misguided in their reasoning. In regard to U.S. Foreign policy, Jack Goldsmith of Lawfare writes:

"The letter states that “the Senate must ratify [a treaty] by a two-thirds vote.” But as the Senate’s own web page makes clear: “The Senate does not ratify treaties. Instead, the Senate takes up a resolution of ratification, by which the Senate formally gives its advice and consent, empowering the president to proceed with ratification” (my emphasis). Or, as this outstanding 2001 CRS Report on the Senate’s role in treaty-making states (at 117): “It is the President who negotiates and ultimately ratifies treaties for the United States, but only if the Senate in the intervening period gives its advice and consent.” Ratification is the formal act of the nation’s consent to be bound by the treaty on the international plane. Senate consent is a necessary but not sufficient condition of treaty ratification for the United States. As the CRS Report notes: “When a treaty to which the Senate has advised and consented … is returned to the President,” he may “simply decide not to ratify the treaty.”The letter states that “the Senate must ratify [a treaty] by a two-thirds vote.” But as the Senate’s own web page makes clear: “The Senate does not ratify treaties. Instead, the Senate takes up a resolution of ratification, by which the Senate formally gives its advice and consent, empowering the president to proceed with ratification” (my emphasis). Or, as this outstanding 2001 CRS Report on the Senate’s role in treaty-making states (at 117): “It is the President who negotiates and ultimately ratifies treaties for the United States, but only if the Senate in the intervening period gives its advice and consent.” Ratification is the formal act of the nation’s consent to be bound by the treaty on the international plane. Senate consent is a necessary but not sufficient condition of treaty ratification for the United States. As the CRS Report notes: “When a treaty to which the Senate has advised and consented … is returned to the President,” he may “simply decide not to ratify the treaty.”

The fact that our own congress has complete disreguard for our president let alone our own constitution amy not only hurt us in our current negotiations with Iran, but those to come. How would you react to this blatant slap in the face?

PRIDE NEWS

Subscribe for Updates

Congrats! You’re subscribed

Small Heading